<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Returns Lie Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolutionofwealth.com/2009/09/when-returns-lie-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolutionofwealth.com/2009/09/when-returns-lie-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Helping People Find, Keep and Enjoy Their Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Of Wealth</title>
		<link>http://evolutionofwealth.com/2009/09/when-returns-lie-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Of Wealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionofwealth.com/?p=223#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment.  I have to give Paul credit he came out with what I was sort of looking for.  I wanted someone to say I was wrong because there is a better way to do it.  Unfortunately, I think I showed that there&#039;s a lot of people out there that don&#039;t realize it and believe some of the misinformation.  Have a great day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment.  I have to give Paul credit he came out with what I was sort of looking for.  I wanted someone to say I was wrong because there is a better way to do it.  Unfortunately, I think I showed that there&#8217;s a lot of people out there that don&#8217;t realize it and believe some of the misinformation.  Have a great day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retirement Savior</title>
		<link>http://evolutionofwealth.com/2009/09/when-returns-lie-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Retirement Savior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionofwealth.com/?p=223#comment-58</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good post, especially for funds or investments that are very volatile.

Looks to me like for a normal retirement portfolio at 10-12% volatility, the difference between arithmetic and geometric returns would be about 50-60bps.

For the S&amp;P, the difference would be about 1.5%, and for emerging markets it&#039;s closer to 3%.

P.S. - Your friend Paul could be a bit gentler in his tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good post, especially for funds or investments that are very volatile.</p>
<p>Looks to me like for a normal retirement portfolio at 10-12% volatility, the difference between arithmetic and geometric returns would be about 50-60bps.</p>
<p>For the S&amp;P, the difference would be about 1.5%, and for emerging markets it&#8217;s closer to 3%.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; Your friend Paul could be a bit gentler in his tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

